Genomic Young Sires To Watch ~ at Runboard.com

Username: Password:
Local User? Lost Password
Register Home Contact Control Panel Logout



COWTALK
 Holstein breeding
  Genomic Young Sires To Watch
Support
Search
RSS

runboard.com       Register for a free global account (learn about it) |
Log in: (), globally (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4  5 

 
SanHaven
VG89
Global user

Registered: 10-2008
Posts: 143
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch


Well stated Buckeye, i'll agree with you all the way here. I think breeding cows is somewhat risk management and genomics over non is probably going to be good while not 100%. Sometimes i question wether genomics would be more reliable as you often see bulls with fairly avg proofs that everyone loves the dtrs etc. Every stud has them. Heres a thought ive pondered. Any bulls you like now that might not have been sampled if they had been genomic tested?
29/5/2009, 3:15   
 
smous
Cowtalk Staff
Global user

Registered: 11-2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1903
Karma: 40 (+40/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Genomic Young Sires To Watch


We have recently marketed Gold-N-Oaks Milhouse: Ramos x Shottle x Ford x Duster and Regancrest Mac Brian: Mac x Shottle x Durham Barbie

---
WWS-SA
29/5/2009, 6:29   
 
Mayjay
EX95
Global user

Registered: 03-2007
Posts: 544
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch


  There are some sceptics that don't trust genomic proofs yet. I ask them this, have any of you purchased a bull with a bad genomic proof ? He had the pedigree that you like, so you just went ahead and bought him knowing he was chalked full of minuses. Most breeders I know ignore the EBV of a young sire, and buy them on pedigree. Can the same be said when the genomic proof is available?
29/5/2009, 18:39   
 
JEB12
EX95
Global user

Registered: 07-2005
Posts: 608
Karma: 7 (+7/-0)
 | 
Genomic Young Sires To Watch


Currently in our herd we are only using genomic proven young sires on hard breeders. I will not use a bull just based on genomic numbers alone, but if I like the pedigree and the genomic numbers are high enough then I will used him more heavily then I normally would. Having said that if a bull has a pedigree I like and his genomic numbers are low then I would not use him at all. A nice benefit of all the genomic young sires is some of the studs are willing to discount some of their higher reliability bulls more than what they had been before genomics.
29/5/2009, 19:33   
 
smous
Cowtalk Staff
Global user

Registered: 11-2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 1903
Karma: 40 (+40/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Genomic Young Sires To Watch


Agree with JEB12 as far as selection goes, the pedigree must look promising and the numbers must be right, if they are 'chalked full of minuses' they will not get a look in, no matter how much we like the pedigree. We take 1000 doses of a young sire for the whole country, that was the status quo before genomics and has not changed with its arrival.

---
WWS-SA
30/5/2009, 6:18   
 
ExpectingRain
EX95
Global user

Registered: 04-2007
Location: SE Cumbria
Posts: 708
Karma: 5 (+5/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch


quote:

SanHaven wrote:

Well stated Buckeye, i'll agree with you all the way here. I think breeding cows is somewhat risk management and genomics over non is probably going to be good while not 100%. Sometimes i question wether genomics would be more reliable as you often see bulls with fairly avg proofs that everyone loves the dtrs etc. Every stud has them. Heres a thought ive pondered. Any bulls you like now that might not have been sampled if they had been genomic tested?



Remark was by Buze77 and not Buckeye emoticon

With respect to the last remark Lylehaven Lightening took some stick in an older thread because his current proof appears to be significantly higher than his genomic one. Interesting to see how he pans out.

---
Crosshutton Holsteins

60 Homebred cows Annual Average 9800 4.2. 3.3
1EX 32VG 16GP 10G 1F 1P
31/5/2009, 4:00   
 
Will Richardson
Cowtalk Staff
Global user

Registered: 06-2003
Location: Close to a pub
Posts: 1350
Karma: 14 (+14/-0)
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch



 Reliability on a parent average is somewhere between 35-40%. A genomic analysis gives you something like a good guess on a 10 daughter proof ... probably about 65%. A decent progeny test about 85% and a widespread proof at 99%. Once a bull has a decent number of test daughters in a proof then that proof is the most reliable.. dont be fooled by clever marketing and bullmanure



 
31/5/2009, 22:40   
 
JTTH
EX93
Global user

Registered: 03-2006
Posts: 366
Karma: 3 (+3/-0)
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch


quote:

Will Richardson wrote:


 Reliability on a parent average is somewhere between 35-40%. A genomic analysis gives you something like a good guess on a 10 daughter proof ... probably about 65%. A decent progeny test about 85% and a widespread proof at 99%. Once a bull has a decent number of test daughters in a proof then that proof is the most reliable.. dont be fooled by clever marketing and bullmanure



 



emoticon emoticon emoticon

EXACTLY - people want to be fooled, they keep forgetting the relaiability of genomics


 

---
Tastum Holsteins
1/6/2009, 7:30   
 
SanHaven
VG89
Global user

Registered: 10-2008
Posts: 143
Karma: 2 (+2/-0)
 | 
Re: Genomic Young Sires To Watch


My apologies, must have been a little drowsy when i wrote that post above and got the name wrong. I think Will is right, well i know Will is right in regard to reliabilities etc. I dont think most studs try to trick you into thinking something else. For me that is why i would use pedigrees and crosses that i like. And if a bull puts it all together all the better. For us i would say we have been burned by using proven bulls that were supposed to be good just as much as using young sires with no information other than pedigree.
1/6/2009, 11:53   
 
Buze77
EX93
Global user

Registered: 04-2006
Posts: 409
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
 | 
Genomic Young Sires To Watch


I would consider it more trickery and BS by hyping a bull and showing PA numbers at 35-40% reliability then showing Genomic numbers at with 65% reliablity.
A 20% spread in the two numbers is HUGE in my opinion.
Like JEB12 already stated. Look for a group of young bulls you like based on pedigree, find the genomic proof that looks the best to your liking and pick that bull.
1/6/2009, 13:46   
 


click here to give a full reply or use the box below for a quick reply



Page:  1  2  3  4  5 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 26/11/2009, 4:50

Disclaimer: Any views expressed on this site are not necessarily the views of the owner or any of the sponsors of Cowtalk..

Make COWTALK Your Homepage






Google
WWW COWTALK

Site Meter