Testing Dawk's MTC ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

Deep Purple Fan Forum
 Music Makers
  Testing Dawk's MTC
Support
Search
RSS

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 

 
KillerBananas
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 11-2003
Location: Über alles!
Posts: 4197
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


Creamstrat, there's no doubt the MTC is working. It has a very nice effect to my ears. My question is if you can get the same effect from a "standard" treble bleed, 'cause there isn't much doubt that's what the MTC is. The interesting part would be to know what values the caps inside the box have. I guess that's Dawks well kept secret.

The two white wires are located at the same place on the volume pot as a treble bleed would be, and afaik the two black wires replaces the standard cap that you have to remove!?! Interesting stuff!

IMO the MTC is a hughely overpriced treble bleed, even if it has got a nice effect. You may get about the same effect from a "normal" treble bleed. Is it a rip off? Nah...I don't know, but IMO Dawk should be honest enough to tell people what they are paying for.

---
Marshall 1987X amp
Marshall 1960AX cab
RBTB
Fender Stratocaster '72 ri, CiJ, YellowWhite, "Full Blackmore Scallop", RBTC
Fender Telecaster Road Worn, Blonde, 2008, RBTC
Gibson Les Paul Standard, "Bettsie", Custom Brockburst, 2008
9/10/2009, 7:59 Send Email to KillerBananas   Send PM to KillerBananas
 
Gatts888
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 11-2008
Posts: 108
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

KillerBananas wrote:

Creamstrat, there's no doubt the MTC is working. It has a very nice effect to my ears. My question is if you can get the same effect from a "standard" treble bleed, 'cause there isn't much doubt that's what the MTC is.



There is, the guy just explained why he doesn't think it is. The only reason you think it is a Treble bleed is because your lord & master/employer had an -no doubt very independent- analysis done. With the same rhetoric I can see people saying the same of Mijf's gadget.

9/10/2009, 8:25 Send Email to Gatts888   Send PM to Gatts888
 
mijfenders
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Posts: 251
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

Rezi wrote:

quote:

mijfenders wrote:

quote:

Rezi wrote:

One treble bleed solution, taken from a Finnish site:



Strats have 250K pots as standard. A 500K pot like this diagram will have broadly the same effect as the Treble Bleed but will thin out your sound at any volume. Fitting a 500K pot in your strat is the best way to ruin the sound of a Lace Sensor setup, it strips the body out the sound. Don't fit this to your Lace strat it will sound pretty dire. Might be effectvie with something like the Seymour Duncans which tend to be muffled anyway.




1) I never said it was for a Strat. I wrote "one solution", not "this is how you make your Strat sound like Blackmore".

2) Reminds me of you, some time ago, reading (well...) my comments on my experiences with certain pickups. You concluded (well...) that I think pickups themselves produce distortion.

3) I think you'd better get off your high technical horse and acting like you're the expert. I understood you have a guy who does the technics and you just sell them? emoticon

4) Yes, 250K is the preferred pot for single coils, 500K for humbuckers.



1) WTF!
Did I say ANYWHERE that you said this was for a STRAT? NO I absolutely didn't at all.
It's simply an observation that a 500K pot would not be the pot of choice for a Strat. As a further general comment being that this configuration would strip the body out of your sound. It might work on Seymours it might not. Seems you feel under attack Rezi, when all that's being presented is general information.
2) Perhaps you could point me to the topic. Some Dimarzio pickups are specifically designed to distort sooner than others, but remind me, what sh1te we were debating back then.
3) Well Rezi, believing all you read has seems to be a weakness of yours, especially where anything "Blackmore" is concerned. nOt the best policy, as things are rarely how they seem, especially in the "music business"

4) Appears to be exactly what I was saying. So again to your measured response I say WTF!
9/10/2009, 9:09 Send Email to mijfenders   Send PM to mijfenders
 
Rezi
Admin
Global user

Registered: 04-2004
Posts: 9269
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

mijfenders wrote:

quote:

Rezi wrote:

quote:

mijfenders wrote:

quote:

Rezi wrote:

One treble bleed solution, taken from a Finnish site:



Strats have 250K pots as standard. A 500K pot like this diagram will have broadly the same effect as the Treble Bleed but will thin out your sound at any volume. Fitting a 500K pot in your strat is the best way to ruin the sound of a Lace Sensor setup, it strips the body out the sound. Don't fit this to your Lace strat it will sound pretty dire. Might be effectvie with something like the Seymour Duncans which tend to be muffled anyway.




1) I never said it was for a Strat. I wrote "one solution", not "this is how you make your Strat sound like Blackmore".

2) Reminds me of you, some time ago, reading (well...) my comments on my experiences with certain pickups. You concluded (well...) that I think pickups themselves produce distortion.

3) I think you'd better get off your high technical horse and acting like you're the expert. I understood you have a guy who does the technics and you just sell them? emoticon

4) Yes, 250K is the preferred pot for single coils, 500K for humbuckers.



1) WTF!
Did I say ANYWHERE that you said this was for a STRAT? NO I absolutely didn't at all.
It's simply an observation that a 500K pot would not be the pot of choice for a Strat. As a further general comment being that this configuration would strip the body out of your sound. It might work on Seymours it might not. Seems you feel under attack Rezi, when all that's being presented is general information.
2) Perhaps you could point me to the topic. Some Dimarzio pickups are specifically designed to distort sooner than others, but remind me, what sh1te we were debating back then.
3) Well Rezi, believing all you read has seems to be a weakness of yours, especially where anything "Blackmore" is concerned. nOt the best policy, as things are rarely how they seem, especially in the "music business"

4) Appears to be exactly what I was saying. So again to your measured response I say WTF!



1. Read your previous post again. 'That ruins the sound of a Strat with Lace Sensors' etc. As for Blackmore sound, that's all you basically post about. Maybe begs a question just why, but I'll pass.

2. Nah. But it was me telling about some experiences with certain Fender pickups when the signal to amp is overdriven and the guitar vol pot full open. You stepped in with "Do you expect to get overdrive from those pickups??!!" Which had nothing to do with the subject.

3. Your weakness is not to comprehend half of what you "read".

4. (sigh) Read the thread. I sent the diagram as a comment to Stratman saying he wasn't aware of the treble bleed. Incidentally, the link he'd posted to was not a Strat.
9/10/2009, 9:48 Send Email to Rezi   Send PM to Rezi
 
KillerBananas
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 11-2003
Location: Über alles!
Posts: 4197
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

Gatts888 wrote:

quote:

KillerBananas wrote:

Creamstrat, there's no doubt the MTC is working. It has a very nice effect to my ears. My question is if you can get the same effect from a "standard" treble bleed, 'cause there isn't much doubt that's what the MTC is.



There is, the guy just explained why he doesn't think it is. The only reason you think it is a Treble bleed is because your lord & master/employer had an -no doubt very independent- analysis done. With the same rhetoric I can see people saying the same of Mijf's gadget.




The only reason I think it's a treble bleed??? Now Dawk fan-boy, let me tell you one thing. Dawk once described the MTC as "Hailicaster Treble Bleed" over at his forum. Still want to discuss if it's a treble bleed or not??? You should read the postings of Dawk more careful over at his forum, and maybe you you'll learn a thing or two along the way emoticon

---
Marshall 1987X amp
Marshall 1960AX cab
RBTB
Fender Stratocaster '72 ri, CiJ, YellowWhite, "Full Blackmore Scallop", RBTC
Fender Telecaster Road Worn, Blonde, 2008, RBTC
Gibson Les Paul Standard, "Bettsie", Custom Brockburst, 2008
9/10/2009, 10:47 Send Email to KillerBananas   Send PM to KillerBananas
 
Stratman70
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 430
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

mijfenders wrote:

Stratman70: I gotta ask! What is your sound clip supposed to demonstrate here ? Is it the POD or the RPA or the MTC ? Surely you realise what the POD actually does to the sound ? It's not called an amp modeller for nothing! You could plug a criket bat with strings and pickups into a POD and it would sound the same as virtually any guitar. The POD changes whatever signal you put into it, into the "sound" you get as the output, that's what the "modelling" software does! If you turn down the volume on the guitar the POD still produces the same signal, just at a reduce volume. With a real amp the sound would change. So as a tool for demonstration of something as "subtle" as the effect of the MTC, it's about as much use a chocolate tea-pot!

I'm not interested in technical stuff. All you say I'll assume you're absolutely right! I think that I made a clear example of how the diffence is with and without MTC. Posting the clip, what Creamstrat already did: we both had the same conclusion: it works! Whether it's a cheap trick made by Dawk or not: I don't care! It does everythin that Dwak claims it supposes to do. Well, maybe I can achieve the same effect with a cheap treble bleed, who knows, but that's up to me, paying the high price or not. Don't blame Dawk for that. He sells something HE made, so he can ask any price he wants, as long as it does what he claims it should do. And to my ears it does!!! So I'm so sorry to tell you the MTC works fine. I almost feel guilty man! maybe I paid too much, but that's up to me. Not Dawk's fault.
quote:


Try the test WITHOUT any amps or pedals, although it's fairly pointless as it's been done already, but then you will get the same result as I got and as Creamstrat got, namely, a minor "treble-bleed" effect which could easily be acheived by the $2 worth of components required to make it. The "tone" you get from your MTC is mostly provided by your own desire to hear it!

What's the use of testing it without stuff I always use when I'm playing electric guitar? When I record, I use the POD and it works for me! When I play with the band, I use my ENGL Thunder combo and to my ears it works exactly the same as with the POD. And of course I use the RPA, because it's part of the chain to get the sound I want.
I did the test yesterday without any devices: just the guitar into the soundcard, like you said. I recorded it (but didn't save it) and you're absolutely right: there isn't much difference, except that the strat with MTC seems to have a little more output. I don't understand that, because it's a passive device, so how could it boost (??) the sound? But according to my own ears it does. I hope you'll understand that I'm not dumb when it comes to guitartone, as you and others complimented me more than once about my sound. That was not all about my playing style, but also the guitarsound.
Just to say, I know what I hear, okay?
quote:


MTC $5 in components $20 assembly and $300 of pure "star-dust". Enjoy.

I will!

But what I really don't understand is that I heard YOUR soundclips on Dawk's forum, way back ago! Ans I was COMPLETE blown away by that huge, impressive sound, made with the MTC, as you claimed back then! You even called yourself DAWKSFAN, or was that someone else? Anyway. That sound of your clips, I never could imitate. That was so frustrating. I tried everything: a tapedeck and I even bought a RBTC device, as you know, but still I couldn't get that sound. Although the RBTC helped me to get another nice sound, but NOT the sound I was aiming at.
Since I have installed the MTC, I recognised THAT sound I was looking for, with YOUR soundsample in mind!!!!!

I'm sorry. You may think what you want, but I'm also finished with this discussion. I'm happy with the MTC and I'm totally independed, not kissing someones ass or what.
And in the case of 'having paid too much', I may agree on that, but I chose to do so, and I'm not gonna complain about it.



---
"I believe in God, Blackmore & Stratocasters" - Stratman70
9/10/2009, 11:21 Send Email to Stratman70   Send PM to Stratman70
 
Stratman70
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 430
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

Creamstrat wrote:

Of course you can hear it on the POD. Same way as you could hear it on every other clip. Why wouldnt it work on the POD. Its like saying you wont be able to hear a pickup change.

I notice that you have now changed your agrument from you cant hear it at all to it must be a treble bleed because you read about treble bleeds in the last few days because people on other forums have started to come up with theories about what they can hear.

How come you had one for a year and raved about it only to strat saying it doenst work at all because you were getting criticised for stealing the idea. We know your version isnt the same, but it has taken the basic idea of a little black box, associated with blackmore (RB - TC. I dont belive that Robert the Bruce crap) and affects the tone of the guitar when the volume is not on full.

The first test showed that it work but you wanted proof using conditions that were obviously going to make the difference least notiecable.

I dont understand whu you are even trying to argue that it doenst work when you can clearly hear that it does. If you cant you must be deaf. You do not need the hearing of a dog.

Why do you totally ignore any of the facts that are presented to you. I did a spectral view test just to see what it looked like. didnt need that to prove it but was interested to see the results which clearly showed that it does make a difference.

To be quite honest I could have afforded for this to be an expensive mistake but it just wasnt. Yes it is expensive and unnecessary, but is the icing on the cake if you have all the other blackmore gear essentials.

I really do wonder if you just got a faulty one. But then again you would not have raved about it for so long. One can only assume you have another agenda

I too have finished with this topic . It has been done to death and Im pretty sure we will never agree. But dont think anyone going silent on teh subject is because they a cowering having come to terms with accepting they were wrong. No. Its just that I for one cannot be bothered to keep on arguing. I dont need to. People can hear for themselves. I have had enough people contact me to say they can clearly hear it. Its just that no one wants to get dragged into this stupid argument by posting on here.

I didnt want to get confrontational but you cant make us to be naive idiots and expected us to lie back and take it.




I agree totally with every word you say on this! I really have the same thoughts about this.



---
"I believe in God, Blackmore & Stratocasters" - Stratman70
9/10/2009, 11:23 Send Email to Stratman70   Send PM to Stratman70
 
mijfenders
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 12-2007
Posts: 251
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


Stratman70: I apologise as it always appears like I'm attacking you guys, really I'm not and it's not my intention. We are slowly making some progress here, in that there is a recognition that the MTC is NOT the "radical tone change" some people have claimed and equally that it and the RBTC both do entirely different things. That's progress with this stuff. The MTC recorded minus amps shows you what effect it has on the overall sound and it's that effect that subsequently becomes amplified or not when applied to the rest of your gear, as discussed. If there is very little change( from the MTC) in the unamplified sound then there will be very little change( from the MTC ) in the amplified sound, it's simple. YOU may not be interested in technical things but at least now you have a better understanding of what your MTC is/isn't doing! That is the purpose of this exercise.

I know you have an RBTC and an MTC and that's good, you can compare both and speak from experience. Remember I've had to put up with years of Dawk-fan-boys, who mostly have neither an RBTC or an MTC, telling me how the RBTC is a "stolen copy" and how "it does'nt work", and a tonne of other defamatory crap, so as you might imagine it's made me less of a fan of Dawk and the MTC than most. There was always room for both these products, but unfortuantely Dawk and his "pit-bull" big Gob Jerry didn't understand this, so they decided to rubish the RBTC, leaving themselves exposed to this type of thing!

Regarding the clips:- I produced for Dawk, which I note they still use and I further note there are NO clips produced by Dawk for the product and we know why now!

Anyway, you have identified the exact issue!

Those clips were played with my standard rig at the time and I thought they sounded pretty good, tonewise too. However this is where the wheels came off the whole MTC thing in that I discovered that regardless of which of my guitars I used, within reason( the 335 is different obviously ), I would sound just the same, or so close to the same as to make no difference. Any of my strats with diffrent Lace pickups, or S6's or even Seymours, with a small adjustment to the tape deck the sound was the same. SO I isolated the different elements of the sound and worked back to the fact, just as you have found( your clean test you didn't save ) and creamstrat also that in the "raw" sound the MTC simply does NOT figure very highly and certianly in no way that would not be found in ANY treblebleed. So again I say if it's NOT in the original signal it will NOT be in the final output, it's simple!

I am tempted to produce a number of sound samples both with and without the MTC in one of my guitars, of course using my normal rig and then ask the "experts" to tell them apart. If nothing else it will be a total laugh, and in many ways very unfair. I guarantee that the results will be very very mixed and in many cases 100% wrong! Maybe you and creamstrat might try that as well. Produce a few samples with and without and let the people guess which is which. You may be surprised. I think you did this before with the RBTC tho of course, on principal, people would say it couldn't possibly be the RBTC!! So on principal they will say they can here the MTC even when it's not there.
 
Did you pay too much for the MTC?
Absolutley in real terms. However as I already wrote the entire sales premise of the MTC and the exclusive/only reason you bought the MTC is it's connection to Blackmore, without which NOBODY would ever buy one and certianly not for $325/350. YOU want to beleive you have bought the same thing as "Blackmore" has in his own guitars. I understand that fully, I've done it myself, it's the ONLY reason anyone who buys the MTC does so, there is no other reason.

On it's on merits the MTC simply doesn't audibly do enough to justify it's price without it's "Blackmore" connection.

Then this brings you back to the same old chestnut...................there is NO way you can ever prove if Blackmore had, or didn't have, one of these MTC's you can buy in ANY of his guitars.

Anyway at the end of the day the MTC has had some good exposure here thanks to you and Creamstrat which in the case of the cleanclips, show or let you hear what it is/isn't adding to your "raw" signal, which is the same signal that will be later amplified. So if it's NOT in that raw signal leaving the guitar then what is getting amplified ?!!

Whatever, enjoy!
9/10/2009, 12:35 Send Email to mijfenders   Send PM to mijfenders
 
KillerBananas
Purple fan
Global user

Registered: 11-2003
Location: Über alles!
Posts: 4197
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

Stratman70 wrote:

Whether it's a cheap trick made by Dawk.....




It's a trick, but it's not cheap emoticon

---
Marshall 1987X amp
Marshall 1960AX cab
RBTB
Fender Stratocaster '72 ri, CiJ, YellowWhite, "Full Blackmore Scallop", RBTC
Fender Telecaster Road Worn, Blonde, 2008, RBTC
Gibson Les Paul Standard, "Bettsie", Custom Brockburst, 2008
9/10/2009, 13:20 Send Email to KillerBananas   Send PM to KillerBananas
 
Rezi
Admin
Global user

Registered: 04-2004
Posts: 9269
Reply | Quote
Re: Testing Dawk's MTC


quote:

KillerBananas wrote:

quote:

Stratman70 wrote:

Whether it's a cheap trick made by Dawk.....




It's a trick, but it's not cheap emoticon



With my salary from MIJF I can buy a box of MTCs and give them to the good people here to test. You're getting one, don't worry! emoticon
9/10/2009, 13:41 Send Email to Rezi   Send PM to Rezi
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 26/11/2009, 1:44