Page: 1 2 3
Al Erikson
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2006
Posts: 2747
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
Interview #4
Another interview with a cynical Ian Gillan...
September 1993 (interview with Ian Gillan)
Int.: You swore you won’t get caught again! Now you’re back in Purple. What was the motivation for that change of mind?
IG: They got me with the feelings! I had such a bad souvenir of the previous experience that, as soon as I was back with my own band, it would have taken to cut my throat off to get me back into Purple. When I heard last year they had fired Joe Lynn (Turner) and that there were rumours about my possible return, it was totally out of question to me at that time. Then someone used the sentimental argument: Deep Purple was about to celebrate its 25th anniversary! I started to revise my judgement, arguing to myself I couldn’t be absent of such an event, as member of the classic line-up of the band. The Gillan name was more and more associated to the project without any agreement from me. So, I gave in to pressure. Now, I think we did a good job. I’m even astonished by the final content of this album (“The Battle Rages on”) which I’m ready to consider as the best produced album of all Purple periods. From that, we’ll see what will happen. I can absolutely not say how long it will last and I only hope that we will be able to carry the forthcoming tour through to a successful conclusion, which is not guaranteed. Nobody makes any plan for the future and that’s much better like that. As usually, we meet again in a dangerously explosive situation!
Int.: That was precisely the second part of my question: what makes you think it will be different this time?
IG: The main difference is that, this time, problems and internal fights may be unveiled. Nobody will try to fix them up or to cover them up. From a personal point of view, it’s even the first time that I don’t feel fully involved from an emotional perspective. It allows me to handle this conflicting situation with more discernment. My band (“Ian Gillan Band”) is ready to get back to business and I already have a solo album in my drawer. To be quite clear, I don’t expect anything anymore from Deep Purple. As for the band itself, it’s a kind of big gambling: either it will be fantastic, or it will be a complete disaster, without anything in between. I just cross the fingers and hopefully, everything’s going ok until the end of the tour: that’s my only objective. The first part of the plan, namely the album, is satisfactory to me.
Int.: Are you aware that all those coming and going with Deep Purple have seriously damaged the myth and the credibility of the band?
IG: You may see things that way, although it’s a negative point of view. If you want to remain positive, you can say that those break-up’s were a good thing because, without them, Deep Purple would have gone much lower! I’m glad I wasn’t member of the band because some periods. I would have hated myself for not behaving like I did then. If you want to go further, I wouldn’t be surprised that this kind of “divorce/reunion” cycle repeat itself in the future. I almost think that it would be a sane thing, for the band as well as for what it represents and for each of its parts. A time to time album + tour would allow each of us to deal with his own things in between and to find a renewed energy in it.
Int.: During the times you were replaced within the band, did you still consider yourself as the natural singer of Deep Purple?
IG: Sincerely, yes. It has nothing to do with pride and Rod (Evans), David (Coverdale) or Joe Lynn (Turner) have nothing to do with that. I have always seen them as fabulous vocalists. It’s only a matter of alchemy that Deep Purple has never been able to find without the combination Gillan/Lord/Paice/Glover/Blackmore. Yet, this alchemy has always been very fragile and only one failing element could lead to disaster. That being said, I prefer much more the way it is than to keep in a kind of boring dead calm.
Int.: When you say that your solo career allows you not to expect anything more from Deep Purple, do you think the other members of the band are doing the same reasoning? Some rumours said that Ritchie might re-form “Rainbow”…
IG: My opinion is that Rainbow should reform. At least, Ritchie could be the boss and do whatever he wants to, without fronting any resistance, without his ideas or his wishes being dissolved in the necessary compromise of Deep Purple, that compromise between the members which gave Deep Purple its uniqueness.
Int.: Deep Purple has always seemed to live in a musical autarky, like being totally closed to what could happen around the band. Personally, did it cause you trouble?
IG: My point of view on that thematic and on what is good to Deep Purple has changed. In 1987-1988, I was indeed very frustrated by the lack of openness and development from the band, that systematic incapacity to integrate external influences. I was wrong and it took me time to realize that, if that external input was crucial for me as an artist – but also as a person – this was not the case for the band. I think it comes from the fact I’ve never been a skilled singer. Back in 1969, when I joined the band, I was looking at those guys as they were ET and I felt inferior to them. When I look at that today, I think we are approaching a step in the history of the band where Deep Purple has to remain Deep Purple and nothing else, without changing anything. That certainly why, after “Slaves and Masters”, which is an attempt to seduce US media, they opted for a more familiar hard rock but not fitting Joe Lynn’s capacities. Sticking to ideas with which it feels natural at ease, that’s what Deep Purple should limit itself to nowadays, and, to that extent, “The Battle Rages on” seems quite successful to me. With that album, Purple recovers its good habits. There’s nothing as comfortable as an old trench coat! As far as I’m concerned, I must adapt to the idea that my solo career is more appropriate to do what I’m pleased with. If Deep Purple is my wife, my solo career is my mistress (smile)!
Int.: What about this 25th anniversary you were talking about earlier? Is there any plan for a celebration?
IG: (ironic laugh) I would be quite surprised by that! When I first raised the idea, I’ve been dismissed. Apparently, that doesn’t mean a lot for some. Anyway, there no possibility to achieve something coordinated among the members of the band. Each one sends his win press-officer to handle the business and it’s now up to me to make the promotion of a band I didn’t want to hear about, since all the others cancelled. Now we have to wait for the first rehearsals of the tour to have a more precise idea of each one’s commitment and state of mind.
Int.: What would be the best word to describe the current situation within Deep Purple?
IG: Chaos!
---
"You and me Baby
Are nothing but mammals
So let's do what they do
On the Discovery channel"
|
|
5/3/2007, 19:48
|
Send Email to Al Erikson
Send PM to Al Erikson
|
strangerinusall
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 05-2004
Posts: 84
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
quote:
Was that show taped or filmed?
That´s the show at the Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ and it was taped. You can watch the DP backline in the Guns´n Roses video for Paradise City who were first on the bill.
|
|
5/3/2007, 22:58
|
Send Email to strangerinusall
Send PM to strangerinusall
|
Rezi
Admin
Global user
Registered: 04-2004
Posts: 9269
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
Al, you're doing brilliant work and I'm sure everybody can appreciate the effort you put into this.
Everybody, buy a pint for Al!
---
New Media.
New Arse.
|
|
6/3/2007, 6:38
|
Send Email to Rezi
Send PM to Rezi
|
Al Erikson
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2006
Posts: 2747
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
quote:
Rezi wrote:
Al, you're doing brilliant work and I'm sure everybody can appreciate the effort you put into this.
Everybody, buy a pint for Al!
Thanks for your kind encouragements, Rezi! I still have about 10 interviews to post, if it's ok with the forum admin team...
---
"You and me Baby
Are nothing but mammals
So let's do what they do
On the Discovery channel"
|
|
6/3/2007, 8:24
|
Send Email to Al Erikson
Send PM to Al Erikson
|
Al Erikson
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2006
Posts: 2747
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
Interview #5
Ritchie has just reformed Rainbow. He talks about his new melodic trends, Doogie White, Deep Purple's singer and Pearl Jam...
September 1995 (RB’s Rainbow reunion – interview with Ritchie Blackmore)
Int: So, after ten years with Deep Purple, we’re on for a new decade with Rainbow?
RB: At the beginning, it was not a reunion: I wanted to make a new band. I wanted to differentiate that band from Rainbow by naming it “Rainbow Moon”. The reason is that I’ve always been fascinated for that aster. Moreover, it was my grand mother’s first name, whom I really admired. I finally changed my mind due to the fact that many bands during these recent years called themselves “Moon” whatever… I opted for “Rainbow”. At least, people will know who they are dealing with…
Int.: When listening to the album (“Stranger in Us All”), it seems that nothing really happened since “Bent out of Shape” which was Rainbow’s last studio album before Deep Purple’s reunion in 1984, since the highly sophisticated atmosphere or care brought to the melody and the arrangements is similar to it.
RB: Indeed. Melodies are my first concern today. I pay much attention today to the preparation of my guitar lines. I can take 2 or 3 weeks to write a song, but I rarely spend more than half an hour to the recording of my solo. Some guitarists might find that strange, but I now pay much more attention to the setting-up of the rhythmic and on the effectiveness of the melody. Most of the guitarists focus too much on the way they can emphasise their guitar playing. I play guitar for 39 years and I’ve been through that stage. Guitar doesn’t represent my main interest. The most important thing is to make a good song and what people will feel when listening to it.
Int.: For many people, you are the guitarist with the most infamous reputation in the world, as a lonesome wolf without any real attach in a band. Why not giving up with all those band names and playing under your own name?
RB: I don’t want to bear the whole responsibility of a project. I need the ambiance which can animate a band, I need to feel the enthusiasm of young musicians. That inspires me much more to be in a band like the one I’m in currently. It is true that I’m rather demanding. It takes much to satisfy me. I’m like a vampire: I regularly need fresh blood. It has always caused me serious troubles, but I’m quickly bored by staying to long with the same people. Although my music may sound similar, I feel much more inspired with new musicians. Besides, I like to see the ones who once were with me flying with their own wings after spending a few time with me, like Ronnie James Dio, David Coverdale and all the others did.
Int.: Rainbow usually seemed a much subtle band, much more than Deep Purple according to some. That sophisticated way to play heavy metal seems to better meet your musical convictions than Deep Purple’s music, apart from “Slaves and Masters” which was more a Rainbow album than anything else.
RB: That album was indeed much more melodious than other Deep Purple’s album, and, despite many people told me they didn’t find it good, it’s one of my favourite. I don’t like the latest Deep Purple’s at all (“The Battle Rages on”). I think it’s he worst album in which I’ve participated. Rainbow offers a kind of rock sophisticated enough to highlight the melodic work. I don’t like performing a music which doesn’t feature a certain structure, I don’t see any interest in that. I did it in the past. 30 years ago, I had the impression to play things which were only about noise. A thing like “Speed King” didn’t suck too much at that time, but I don’t feel any pleasure in listening to it or in playing it again. It’s only a short riff played at full speed. I don’t listen to that kind of rock anymore. I focus on the melodies, be it in classical music, or folk, or blues… Whatever the success of the album, it’s always a big relief when you leave the studio satisfied by the stuff you’ve recorded. That doesn’t happen often to me, but this album is the closest thing to the music I’d make for myself.
Int.: How do you manage to find musicians crazy enough to play with you?
RB: I don’t know everything about my reputation, but I guess it’s made basically by people who leave the band. I’ve never experienced any problem to find people to play along with me.
Int.: Anyway, you’re not the kind to make it last with your band partners…
RB: I often change my musicians because I’m note 100% satisfied musically speaking. It’s rarely a personality problem. Most of the time, the main reason for some to quit is the musical orientation. If I get rid of someone, it’s not because I can’t stand him: it’s just because he doesn’t play what I want him to play.
Int.: How do “divorces” take place? Do you send them a note, or your lawyer, or does it happen the friendly way?
RB: No, generally speaking, it’s the management who send them a letter. As for Ronnie James Dio, I won’t deny his wonderful singing skills, but the problem was that he always sang the same way. And also, he married that weird woman who happened to have a strong influence on him…
Int.: And the little newcomer, Dougie White?
RB: Hum! He’s already left! (bold laugh). No, just kidding. He’s Scottish and that shows in his temperament. It’s a real funny guy. We often played together in pubs. I take my acoustic guitar and we go out for a [drinking party]. He’s a considerable repertoire of incredible English and Scottish funny folk songs. He’s always very inspired: you just give him two or three words, a rough melody and he makes you a song in the next minute. No other singer makes me laugh like he does.
Int.: Did you feel afraid in ending up on your own after ten years with Deep Purple?
RB: I’m chronically stressed. You can hardly find someone more negative and stressed than I am. But, on the other hand, I don’t have a problem to be like that. Right now, everything’s fine with the band and that is all that matters to me. We are the best friends and I think it will still last 2 or 3 months (ironic smile) before a bad feeling appear. I think that, in the long term, it will be too hard to stand.
Int.: When you left Deep Purple, people thought “Dio’s available, so is Graham Bonnet, Joe Lynn Turner is looking for a job…”. They could expect you to call one of them back. Instead of that, you preferred quite unknown fellows, freshly graduated from school…
RB: That’s a kind of bet. But I wanted to avoid the mistake of going back with the same people. That’s much too annoying. I did it with Deep Purple, but I wasn’t quite happy to end up with them once again. I appreciate them as musicians, even though it’s not the case for the singer, but it is true I couldn’t get 100% involved with them. I want to point out however that the reason I left was the said singer. I like singers who can sing: that might be useful. I can’t stand the ones who are not able to.
Int.: Dougie’s vocals sound close to Joe Lynn Turner’s however…
RB: Don’t tell him if you meet him! Dougie doesn’t like Joe’s voice at all. I love Dio’s but he can’t stand Joe’s voice. For me, this is not a problem, it’s even a good thing that people find similarities with the Turner’s period of Rainbow.
Int.: Nevertheless, this album tends to demonstrate that not many bands of those last years have raised your enthusiasm enough to make you wish to explore new styles…
RB: Indeed. I haven’t heard many things which have impressed me, apart from King's X . It’s one of the best bands I’ve heard for many years. They’re probably too good to succeed. People generally prefer to keep on hearing the same ridiculous songs. As long as you’re on TV, you’ll get a big success. I find it quite strange, the relations between popularity, music, fashion, etc. make me want to throw up. I hate fashion and trends. What I don’t like in business nowadays is that, when a band plays the music they like but don’t fit in popular trends, they’re artistically doomed. The record company cuts their deal off. Everybody feels somehow obliged to follow the latest trend: “Let’s sound like Pearl Jam!” and suddenly, you see a bunch of bands sounding exactly the same. The radio stations, the records stores bet money on such bands. At the end, people don’t think anymore and buy the stuff they’re told to buy. It’s a kind of communism where you have to buy what’s in the party’s line.
Int.: What’s your position with regard to the journalists who will certainly ask you: “Ritchie, many things happened since 1984. There was the rise of heavy metal, then the grunge: how can you ignore bands like Nirvana or Pearl Jam? And how can you keep playing that Rainbow’s music nowadays? Do you sicerely hope the kids will come at your shows to see that? You must be kidding?
RB: It’s obvious many people must think that way, but I remain honest. I don’t make compromises. That the music I play, that’s it.
Last edited by Al Erikson, 10/3/2007, 12:11
---
"You and me Baby
Are nothing but mammals
So let's do what they do
On the Discovery channel"
|
|
8/3/2007, 18:40
|
Send Email to Al Erikson
Send PM to Al Erikson
|
MrEd45
Admin
Global user
Registered: 09-2003
Location: California, United States
Posts: 9978
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
quote:
Al Erikson wrote:
quote:
Rezi wrote:
Al, you're doing brilliant work and I'm sure everybody can appreciate the effort you put into this.
Everybody, buy a pint for Al!
Thanks for your kind encouragements, Rezi! I still have about 10 interviews to post, if it's ok with the forum admin team...
Been meaning to drop by & compliment your efforts, Al! Great work, and keep it up when the mood strikes you or when you have the time.
---
" Those who can - do. Those who can't do - teach. Those who can't do or teach - administrate."
- Anon.
" One that will not reason is a bigot. One that cannot reason is an ignoramus. One that dares not reason is a slave." - Anon
|
|
8/3/2007, 19:40
|
Send Email to MrEd45
Send PM to MrEd45
Blog
|
MrsSnap
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2003
Location: Germany, SH
Posts: 2240
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
just bringing it to the first site again. 
|
|
14/3/2007, 8:56
|
Send Email to MrsSnap
Send PM to MrsSnap
|
dp344
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 387
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
Int.: How do “divorces” take place? Do you send them a note, or your lawyer, or does it happen the friendly way?
RB: No, generally speaking, it’s the management who send them a letter. As for Ronnie James Dio, I won’t deny his wonderful singing skills, but the problem was that he always sang the same way. And also, he married that weird woman who happened to have a strong influence on him…
Talking about influences of a woman...
|
|
14/3/2007, 11:52
|
Send Email to dp344
Send PM to dp344
|
MrsSnap
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2003
Location: Germany, SH
Posts: 2240
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
quote:
dp344 wrote:
Int.: How do “divorces” take place? Do you send them a note, or your lawyer, or does it happen the friendly way?
RB: No, generally speaking, it’s the management who send them a letter. As for Ronnie James Dio, I won’t deny his wonderful singing skills, but the problem was that he always sang the same way. And also, he married that weird woman who happened to have a strong influence on him…
Talking about influences of a woman...
Probably that happened before he met Candice. 
|
|
15/3/2007, 15:31
|
Send Email to MrsSnap
Send PM to MrsSnap
|
Al Erikson
Purple fan
Global user
Registered: 09-2006
Posts: 2747
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: The Interviews Serie 1990 - 1998
Interview #6
Steve Morse has joined the band and recorded "Purpendicular" with Purple. The rehearsal for the 1996 tour are about to start. Steve is interviewed in Florida, at Christmas 1995.
January 1996 (interview with Steve Morse)
Int.: How come that you fit in Deep Purple coming from jazz-rock (Dixie Dregs) and pomp-rock (Kansas)?
SM: At first sight, one might not quite understand what I am doing with Deep Purple. But you have to know how strong my exposure to and my influences from Deep Purple were. I’ve been influenced very early by Purple’s music, especially by Machine Head and the way Blackmore and Lord used to play together, particularly on songs like “Child in Time”, that wonderful jam. At that time, nobody, except Emerson, Lake & Palmer, used to play like that. In the States, Machine Head had a considerable influence. “Highway Star” is a little bit like early Van Halen’s and that’s exactly how the early Van Halen’s albums sound like: almost the same vocals and the same infernal guitar.
Our managers were already in touch before I knew. Roger Glover was the first to think of me after coming to my shows, and I think that Ian Gillan had some of my records. Anyway, we were quite clear on the fact that we first needed an experiment period before I officially joined the band. Thank to the experience I had with all the other bands I’d played with, I knew this kind of things requires some time. You don’t ask a girl’s hand just after the first date, you first try a while before. But, according to the others, I was their unique choice. So…
Int.: How did you manage to install your playing in a long-time established band like Deep Purple?
SM: Well, about that, I’ve always been quite honest: I’d warned them. If they were looking for a guy just to follow their command, they were knocking at the wrong door. With me, it is impossible not to try new things and not to question old ones. If we talk about a “Purple-formula”, I think that has always been the same whatever the line-up: to play good music, in an aggressive way with no regard to the fashion. This is what the essence of Deep Purple is, according to me. Now, by bringing young blood, the alchemy of the band has changed and that has allowed to explore new territories and, for everyone, to participate in at the same level of the others, like it was the case in the 70’s. We’ve worked quite hard, but without any dispute. Stuff like “The Aviator” or “Touch away” sound quite obvious to me while they are somehow new to the others. As far as the on stage is concerned, I also have some ideas which I need to propose to the band in January. For instance, I’d like to re-insert “Hush” which was a huge hit which gets a little bit forgotten nowadays. Actually, I would like that we prepare two sets: one based on old stuff and the other based on new stuff. That way, the band doesn’t get bored to quickly and the fans can see two different shows during the tour.
Int.: You will join the band after their tour with Satriani. Do you hope this tour will reconciliate the band after the disastrous experience in 1993?
SM: We’ll see. I know that the previous album and the following tour have experienced some difficulties. But let’s see things the nice way: Blackmore didn’t prevent the band from going on. In that kind of situation, he could easily have forbidden the others to use the Deep Purple’s name. It has happened many times. Anyway, he didn’t do it and I think it is fair-play from him. Since we’re talking about it, I’ve never met Ritchie Blackmore. Once, I played on the same bill as Rainbow’s, but that’s all. I’d like to shake his hand and talk with him. You know, I can get along with any musician…
Last edited by Al Erikson, 6/4/2007, 14:11
---
"You and me Baby
Are nothing but mammals
So let's do what they do
On the Discovery channel"
|
|
6/4/2007, 14:09
|
Send Email to Al Erikson
Send PM to Al Erikson
|
Add a reply
Page: 1 2 3
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 25/11/2009, 17:09
|
|
|
