WORLD GOVERNMENT ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

Local User? Lost Password

Contact Register Logout Chat

Gallery
KnottyLocks Forum
 Politics
  WORLD GOVERNMENT


RSS

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page  1  2  3 

 
Tangle
KnottyLocks.Tk

Global User



Registered: 09-2009
Posts: 230
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
Avatar
 | 
WORLD GOVERNMENT


 emoticon

---
Image
10/13/2009, 6:53 pm
 
majestical
Goon Fiend!

Global User



Registered: 05-2007
Location: en cavale
Posts: 4657
Karma: 58 (+74/-16)
Avatar
 | 
Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT


" QUOTE "

WORLD GOVERNMENT



 emoticon emoticon emoticon

---
Imagewhile somewhere distant, peacefully
our vulgar princes sleep

dead kids don't get photographed
god bless this century
10/13/2009, 8:26 pm   
 
Bardon
KnottyLocks.Tk

Global User



Registered: 10-2008
Posts: 1227
Karma: 19 (+19/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT


This is a joke...
10/14/2009, 8:13 pm   
 
Sir Cheshire
Irken Invader

Global User



Registered: 04-2006
Location: Woking
Posts: 3828
Karma: 34 (+60/-26)
Avatar
 | 



i dont have a particularly big problem with world gov because nations are mostly broken down into subsections anyway. i guess the un doesnt count as a world government because its largely ineffectual and it doesnt have an army that can rival the best of the subsections. would a world goverment have an army though? it would have no nation to rival with to make it relevant. uprising and protection of its own citizens from each other is more of a policing thing that the army only deal with because theyre ready for heavy situations.
In europe we've got the EU parliment forming slowly, and it does have a lot of control over governments because its almost a trade blockade to be kicked out for denying regulations, but its regulations are more on consumer rights and product quality, things that are more relevant to trade (which is what its all about really).

there are a lot of places where during a mild drought, a rich country runs better technology on the aquaplane beneath the soil to pump out the water and the country next to it just gets completely dried up from it and everyone starts dying, so international rules seem pretty essential. i dont think americans like it though because they'd prefer the Team America World Police idea which leads to the obvious bias of countries getting ransacked for resources while the policing is done by people with a distorting media working for people with an agenda

---
Image
10/18/2009, 10:56 am   
 
Loccsta
Blacc

Global User



Registered: 10-2004
Location: babylon
Posts: 37427
Karma: 521 (+788/-267)
Avatar
 | 
Re: WORLD GOVERNMENT


the world is interconnected as it is. the UN is world govt. not all govt need armies. they can instead exert 'soft power' which can be more effective then hard power... emoticon
10/19/2009, 12:17 am   
 
Sir Cheshire
Irken Invader

Global User



Registered: 04-2006
Location: Woking
Posts: 3828
Karma: 34 (+60/-26)
Avatar
 | 



the UK just had a big scandal about our parliment members' expense claims (someone tried claiming a duck pond in the garden was something the tax payer should pay for because it was necessary for them to do their work and many others got a free house in the middle of a city on expenses when it wasnt necessary) so the idea of an international parliment for the EU has got people really pissed off round here because its a whole load of other people making bogus claims when theyre work is mostly seen as creating regulations that only cause harm. I like the direction we're working towards but it looks like its moving at a reasonable pace already over here and we need to iron out the flaws before moving on to the next steps

---
Image
10/19/2009, 3:20 am   
 
Tangle
KnottyLocks.Tk

Global User



Registered: 09-2009
Posts: 230
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Re: …


" QUOTE "

Sir Cheshire wrote:

... Team America World Police...


emoticon


Yeah I don't know. I watched some conspiracy video the other day and I wanted to post up vaguely to see what came back. Seems people are so (a)pathetic that should things go down they wouldn't care as long as they (the majority) got theirs; but isn't that the way it works most of the time?

I look back in history and note, for the most part, mankinds constant attempts at empire and control, of course by those who lead. And I wonder what form the next empire will take. Will it not be obvious like cultural hegemony (soft power) by corporate giants. They shoot AK-47's at the empire after they lace up the nikes.

 

---
Image
10/21/2009, 10:55 am
 
Dirt McGurt
KnottyLocks.Tk

Global User



Registered: 06-2009
Location: appalachian mountains
Posts: 589
Karma: 3 (+3/-0)
Avatar
 | 



dude what's up with you and starting topics by saying nothing?

---
Yo, I'm the cunt breath asshole eater
And if you let me physically eat it, it only get (burps)
10/21/2009, 12:37 pm
 
Tangle
KnottyLocks.Tk

Global User



Registered: 09-2009
Posts: 230
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
Avatar
 | 
Re: …


" QUOTE "

Dirt McGurt wrote:

dude what's up with you and starting topics by saying nothing?



 emoticon Yeah, like 2012? emoticon

---
Image
10/21/2009, 4:48 pm
 
Loccsta
Blacc

Global User



Registered: 10-2004
Location: babylon
Posts: 37427
Karma: 521 (+788/-267)
Avatar
 | 
Re: …


" QUOTE "

Tangle wrote:

" QUOTE "

Sir Cheshire wrote:

... Team America World Police...


emoticon


Yeah I don't know. I watched some conspiracy video the other day and I wanted to post up vaguely to see what came back. Seems people are so (a)pathetic that should things go down they wouldn't care as long as they (the majority) got theirs; but isn't that the way it works most of the time?

I look back in history and note, for the most part, mankinds constant attempts at empire and control, of course by those who lead. And I wonder what form the next empire will take. Will it not be obvious like cultural hegemony (soft power) by corporate giants. They shoot AK-47's at the empire after they lace up the nikes.

 








The united states reluctantly took the role of 'world police' fallowing the end of the second world war era. their were no other national powers absent russia who were capable of nation building. europe was completely destroyed.emoticon
and china was hardly even developed, both countries were industrially and economically inadequate.emoticon


American interventionism was the only viable option otherwise world order would have likely spiraled in to a state of feudalism, anarchism or sub-modern tribalism. the bottom line is absent comprehensive intervention.emoticon
be it through the russians or the americans, civilization would have declined in to a new dark age... emoticon
10/27/2009, 11:55 pm   
 


Add a reply


Page  1  2  3 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/25/2009, 7:36 pm

Google