Michel de Bouard and the English ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

Norman Invasion Chatboard
 Norman Chatboard
  Michel de Bouard and the English
Support
Search
RSS

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4 

 
Housecarl 1066
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 02-2006
Location: Northern-most Saxon border.
Posts: 603
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Hwaet King Harold!

Though you must expect a limp-wristed backlash from the woeful jerks here known as WTFW[WhytheFrenchWannabe?]- it's akin to a Liberace slap ! emoticon emoticon

They're the hilarious but irksome resident geek going by one user-ID;- a pompous, historically-impotent and Socialist nerd that projects his own disturbing 'Ed Gein-like' fantasies upon this board only (he/she hasn't the accuracy or stomach for debate, so daren't be challenged on any other websites)! emoticon emoticon

Keep up the good work!

Last edited by Housecarl 1066, 5/25/2008, 5:41 pm


---
http://www.englistory.co.uk
5/25/2008, 5:40 pm Send PM to Housecarl 1066 Blog
 
mousteriana
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 935
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Harold Godwinsson:


quote:

Harold Godwinsson wrote:

Eala and Heal

I'm Harold Godwinsson!

You know me, i'm the man you keep calling The Usurper!

Frankly, well, i don't happen to enjoy being called a Usurper, especially when i was offered the crown of England or should i say Engloland, or perhaps Englalond since there has been so many ways of spelling or saying it since before William the "Bastard", since that is what he was, and who was the true Usurper of a Land and Kingdom that wasn't his in the first place, was it!

But any way i digress a little, i was offered the Crown of my Country, Homeland by that Country's, Homeland's Witan or early form of English Parliament, so therefore, in what way, by any imagination am i a Usurper?

The Witan, An Early form of English Parliament, so you see, we thought of it long before that French fellow, i forget his name?

But any way, would you please not accuse me of being a Usurper in my own Homeland, you see it does rather erk me a bit, it makes me want to break a few Norman heads, and such things so do please try not to accuse me of being something i wasn't.




Welcome to the group! I am glad you have come here, since, based on my reading, I, too, object to the "usurper" nonsense that has been perpetuated.

As many of you know, but some here refuse to accept, in English law and custim the Witan made the final decision about the succession, if there were several possible candidates. Otherwise, they would simply affirm the succession, but this, too, was necessary. The idea that Harold Godwinson waas somehow a "usurper" is based on the rather shaky(IMO) notion that Edward "the Confessor" promised the throne to William. . . but then, he seems to have gone around promising the throne to anyone who would listen to him, including King Magnus of Norway, at one time. Nothing came of that. By 1066, Harold, who hadnot, despite later Norman claims, been particularly active in seeking the throne, was the only credible candidate. Both Edward and the various people who constituted the Witan at the time, knew this. And, for that matter, it is a pretty sure bet that William knew this(otherwise, why all this stuff about the "oath"?). As far as William was concerned, he had to back up his challenge with something that sounded halfway credible, hence all the claims about Harold being a "usurper", despite the fact he was chosen by what were, at the time, perfectly legal and customary means.
Anne G
5/25/2008, 7:43 pm Send Email to mousteriana   Send PM to mousteriana
 
Harold Godwinsson
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 05-2008
Posts: 3
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


quote:

mousteriana wrote:

Harold Godwinsson:


quote:

Harold Godwinsson wrote:

Eala and Heal

I'm Harold Godwinsson!

You know me, i'm the man you keep calling The Usurper!

Frankly, well, i don't happen to enjoy being called a Usurper, especially when i was offered the crown of England or should i say Engloland, or perhaps Englalond since there has been so many ways of spelling or saying it since before William the "Bastard", since that is what he was, and who was the true Usurper of a Land and Kingdom that wasn't his in the first place, was it!

But any way i digress a little, i was offered the Crown of my Country, Homeland by that Country's, Homeland's Witan or early form of English Parliament, so therefore, in what way, by any imagination am i a Usurper?

The Witan, An Early form of English Parliament, so you see, we thought of it long before that French fellow, i forget his name?

But any way, would you please not accuse me of being a Usurper in my own Homeland, you see it does rather erk me a bit, it makes me want to break a few Norman heads, and such things so do please try not to accuse me of being something i wasn't.




Welcome to the group! I am glad you have come here, since, based on my reading, I, too, object to the "usurper" nonsense that has been perpetuated.

As many of you know, but some here refuse to accept, in English law and custim the Witan made the final decision about the succession, if there were several possible candidates. Otherwise, they would simply affirm the succession, but this, too, was necessary. The idea that Harold Godwinson waas somehow a "usurper" is based on the rather shaky(IMO) notion that Edward "the Confessor" promised the throne to William. . . but then, he seems to have gone around promising the throne to anyone who would listen to him, including King Magnus of Norway, at one time. Nothing came of that. By 1066, Harold, who hadnot, despite later Norman claims, been particularly active in seeking the throne, was the only credible candidate. Both Edward and the various people who constituted the Witan at the time, knew this. And, for that matter, it is a pretty sure bet that William knew this(otherwise, why all this stuff about the "oath"?). As far as William was concerned, he had to back up his challenge with something that sounded halfway credible, hence all the claims about Harold being a "usurper", despite the fact he was chosen by what were, at the time, perfectly legal and customary means.
Anne G




Huscarl Heal!

I understand mate, i was expecting nothing else from those who would attempt to legitimize the Butcher "Usurper" William the Tanner's Bastard Son!

Anne Heal!

Well posted Friend, i'm not sure but i have read that in Germanic ways, a man was chosen for his abilities, not wether he was heir or successer, according to Tacitus that is, and our Anglo-Saxon Ancestors continued with that form of early Democratic system right until well, the "Usurper" William Butted in.

Therefore as you so rightly say, being chosen by the Witan was just a continuation of that earler Germanic form of Kingship or Leader picking.

Of course i could be wrong and i'm open to any constructive comments!

Waes Heal

Harold II, Chosen King of England

5/26/2008, 10:58 am Send Email to Harold Godwinsson   Send PM to Harold Godwinsson
 
mousteriana
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 935
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Harold:

[quoteWell posted Friend, i'm not sure but i have read that in Germanic ways, a man was chosen for his abilities, not wether he was heir or successer, according to Tacitus that is, and our Anglo-Saxon Ancestors continued with that form of early Democratic system right until well, the "Usurper" William Butted in.

Therefore as you so rightly say, being chosen by the Witan was just a continuation of that earler Germanic form of Kingship or Leader picking.

Of course i could be wrong and i'm open to any constructive comments!




Well, I wouldn't say the system was exactly "democratic" by our standards. Usually, the the king would designate a successor(who was usually one of his sons), as "subregulus" --- yes, there actually was such a designation --- and, other things being equal, the Witan would go along with it. This usually insured an "orderly" succession without too much fuss. But if the king didn't have an heir, or the heir was too young, or perhaps incompetent in other ways, the Witan could choose somebody who was thought to be more suitable. And yes, this does hark back to a "Germanic" system, but it worked reasonably well in England, at least. Since Edward "the Confessor" had no children, and apparently the family member in the shape of Edgar Aetheling was thought too young and untried, and you, OTOH, were a known quantity with the kind of experience a king needed in that age, the Witan chose you instead of young Edgar. Besides which, on his deathbed, before witinesses, Edward "the Confessor" designated you to be the next King of the English. This was perfectly legal in England at that time, so the Witan, naturally, had to go along with it.
Anne G
5/26/2008, 6:50 pm Send Email to mousteriana   Send PM to mousteriana
 
Harold Godwinsson
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 05-2008
Posts: 3
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


quote:

mousteriana wrote:

Harold:

[quoteWell posted Friend, i'm not sure but i have read that in Germanic ways, a man was chosen for his abilities, not wether he was heir or successer, according to Tacitus that is, and our Anglo-Saxon Ancestors continued with that form of early Democratic system right until well, the "Usurper" William Butted in.

Therefore as you so rightly say, being chosen by the Witan was just a continuation of that earler Germanic form of Kingship or Leader picking.

Of course i could be wrong and i'm open to any constructive comments!




Well, I wouldn't say the system was exactly "democratic" by our standards. Usually, the the king would designate a successor(who was usually one of his sons), as "subregulus" --- yes, there actually was such a designation --- and, other things being equal, the Witan would go along with it. This usually insured an "orderly" succession without too much fuss. But if the king didn't have an heir, or the heir was too young, or perhaps incompetent in other ways, the Witan could choose somebody who was thought to be more suitable. And yes, this does hark back to a "Germanic" system, but it worked reasonably well in England, at least. Since Edward "the Confessor" had no children, and apparently the family member in the shape of Edgar Aetheling was thought too young and untried, and you, OTOH, were a known quantity with the kind of experience a king needed in that age, the Witan chose you instead of young Edgar. Besides which, on his deathbed, before witinesses, Edward "the Confessor" designated you to be the next King of the English. This was perfectly legal in England at that time, so the Witan, naturally, had to go along with it.
Anne G



Heal Anne

Well i supose it wasn't what you could call Democratic as we believe it should be today, but it was certainly far more Democratic than the latter Norman feudal system i believe!

Well chosing me was the best oppsion since the Atheling was to young and Edward himself had no other choice but to pick me since i was the right man for the thrown, or should i say he, Harold was the best man for the thrown!

Heal Harold II, Last Native King of the English!

Waes Heal Anne

Harold

5/27/2008, 10:50 am Send Email to Harold Godwinsson   Send PM to Harold Godwinsson
 
mousteriana
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 935
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Harold:


quote:

Harold Godwinsson wrote:



Heal Anne

Well i supose it wasn't what you could call Democratic as we believe it should be today, but it was certainly far more Democratic than the latter Norman feudal system i believe!

Well chosing me was the best oppsion since the Atheling was to young and Edward himself had no other choice but to pick me since i was the right man for the thrown, or should i say he, Harold was the best man for the thrown!

Heal Harold II, Last Native King of the English!

Waes Heal Anne

Harold




Whatever. The Witan obviously agreed with you, rightly or wrongly(and in English usage, it would have been rightly).
Anne G

5/27/2008, 11:59 pm Send Email to mousteriana   Send PM to mousteriana
 
WilliamtheRed Forum1
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 121
Karma: -3 (+0/-3)
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


The Witan was the fiefdom of the House of Wessex in 1066. There was nothing 'democratic' about it.
Paul (personal capacity)
5/28/2008, 9:26 pm Send Email to WilliamtheRed Forum1   Send PM to WilliamtheRed Forum1
 
mousteriana
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 935
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Paul:

The Witan was no more the "fiefdom" of the Godwins in 1066 than it was the "fiefdom" of anybody else before then. I agree that it wasn't very "democratic" in any sense we would understand today, but it had several purposes, and always had. One of these purposes was to insure, as much as possible, that there would be a stable period during the transition from one king to another. This insured that, if there was no designated heir or candidate for kingship, the Witan could choose one(there had been periods in the past where there were several candidates). This also tended to insure that the kingdom wouldn't fall into a bunch of civil strife. It was basically, in this case, a "backup" system. Since the "House of Wessex" in 1066 was Edward "the Confessor", who had no children to whom he could designate the crown, it really wasn't the "fiefdom" of anybody. And the fact is, the Witan thought Harold Godwinson was the most suitable candidate, whatever you want to make of this.
Anne G
5/29/2008, 1:47 am Send Email to mousteriana   Send PM to mousteriana
 
WilliamtheRed Forum1
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 10-2007
Posts: 121
Karma: -3 (+0/-3)
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Anne G,
You have forgotten about Egbert and the 820's. Angleland was never the same again.It is in addition necessary to take on board the fact that the Usurper was raised as a Cnutian.If you add the events of the 820's and 1016-42 you get the correct historical 'arithmetic'. You seem to want to turn it into a matter of "how many beans make five?".It isn't.

Bill H,Chairperson (personal capacity)
5/31/2008, 11:39 am Send Email to WilliamtheRed Forum1   Send PM to WilliamtheRed Forum1
 
mousteriana
Registered user
Global user

Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 935
Karma: 6 (+6/-0)
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Michel de Bouard and the English


Bill H. and WRTF 1:


quote:

WilliamtheRed Forum1 wrote:

Anne G,
You have forgotten about Egbert and the 820's. Angleland was never the same again.It is in addition necessary to take on board the fact that the Usurper was raised as a Cnutian.If you add the events of the 820's and 1016-42 you get the correct historical 'arithmetic'. You seem to want to turn it into a matter of "how many beans make five?".It isn't.

Bill H,Chairperson (personal capacity)



Hmmmm. . . . I don't recall that there was a philosophy or political party of "Cnutianism" at that time. And there is nothing, I reapeat, nothing that I know of to indicate that King Harold(despite your claims, he didn't "usurp" anything) Harold followed any such philosophy or political party, assuming such a thing existed. Unless, of course, you want to say he was just a clone of his father Godwin.
Anne G
5/31/2008, 3:57 pm Send Email to mousteriana   Send PM to mousteriana
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/25/2009, 3:58 pm