Incog4
Senior Member
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
U.S. Presidential candidates CONFIRM their obligations TO ISRAEL
The Jerusalem Post
http://blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?cat_id=4&blog_id=73&blog_post_id=1145
May 24 2007; 09:05AM
The Road to the White House: Israel-US ties
In the run-up to the 2008 US presidential elections, The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition
JPost.com has invited central presidential contenders to respond to questions on
matters of importance to Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish world.
We will be sending out questions to the candidates every two weeks or so. We started
out with a relatively general inquiry about the importance they attach to the US's strategic
alliance with Israel and how, if elected, they would work to foster that alliance (see
below). The questions will get more specific as the campaign heats up.
The first question was sent to John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Barack
Obama, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson and Sam Brownback.
The contenders are being invited to participate, and given as much space as they wish
to respond. We believe this platform offers a tremendous opportunity for the would-be
presidents to detail their positions on key issues for our millions of readers, potential
voters and supporters. And we are delighted that, from the outset, so many of the
candidates have found the time to participate, with carefully drafted, nuanced answers
that offer real insight into their thinking.
David Horovitz, Editor-In-Chief
Question #1
What's the importance of Israel as a strategic ally and how would your administration
manage ties between the two countries?
Contributors: (read it all or click on name to read post)
* Senator John McCain of Arizona (R)
* Senator Hillary Clinton of New York (D)
* Senator Barack Obama of Illinois (D)
* Former Governor Mitt Romney of Massachusetts (R)
* Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico (D)
* Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas (R)
The question was sent to John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani, Barack Obama,
John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden, Bill Richardson and Sam Brownback.
(Clipped here)
++++++++++++++++
I'll leave it to you interested readers to peruse the published answers of
the named Republicans and Democrats, while assuring you that EACH OF
THEM had bowed, scraped and groveled to the "Campaign Money Machine" which
is the Zionism political conspiracy AMONG that 2 percent of us who are Jewish
in the entire world, but who are able to "wag the dog" which is the other 98 percent.
Aaron
++++++++++++++++
|
|
5/28/2007, 2:38 pm
|
Send Email to Incog4
Send PM to Incog4
|
Joseph Sarandos
Head Administrator
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: U.S. Presidential candidates CONFIRM their obligations TO ISRAEL
Good find, Aaron.
Those of you who’d bothered to read the answers of the named candidates should have no doubts that the next U.S. President will be pre-committed to “the interests of Israel in general,” but especially to aiding and abetting Israel in the causes of making war against its ancient and modern “natural enemies”.
While the Bush Administration, with the help of the Congress, via the Zionist propaganda machine, is in the process of deceiving the American public into thinking and hoping that it has backed away from its “sabre-rattling” provocations against especially Iran, in favor of “diplomatic relations” with it, each of the possible successors to Bush are literally promising Israel that the United States will attack Iran under their administrations.
Make no mistake about this. if and when a military attack is launched against Iran, that will be the trigger of World War Three; a war in which America, Israel and Britain will be pitted against at least Russia, China, possibly Turkey, and the bulk of Arab and Moslem nations and peoples (including those within the populations of America, Britain and Israel).
Speaking pragmatically, the wars in Korea, Vietnam, and now in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with the Israel-Hezbollah fiasco, have highlighted the facts that the Nuclear powers of America, Britain and Israel are not similarly powerful, much less invincible, in Conventional warfare or against guerilla warfare.
World War Three should not involve Nuclear Weapons, since none but Israel would risk the retaliatory destruction of their major cities rather than face the possibility of their annihilation as POLITICAL ENTITIES. In other words, ONLY ZIONIST ISRAEL would rather “take the rest of the world with it to Hell” than abandon its plan to dominate all of the Gentiles in THIS life.
So, those who are not yet worried about the controlling influence that the Zionists have achieved in the United States, should START worrying about it, based on the “carefully drafted, nuanced answers that offer real insight into their thinking” that were stated by the U.S. Presidential candidates in the Jerusalem Post article.
---------
Joseph
|
|
5/30/2007, 12:15 pm
|
Send Email to Joseph Sarandos
Send PM to Joseph Sarandos
|
Add a reply
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 1/7/2009, 9:07 pm
|
|
|
