"Time" is a FALSE explanation by Evolutionists ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

The Full Truth Forum
 Creationism vs Evolutionism
  "Time" is a FALSE explanation by Evolutionists
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
Joseph Sarandos
Head Administrator
Global user

Reply | Quote
"Time" is a FALSE explanation by Evolutionists


“It happened over millions, even billions years of Time,”
say those who can’t support the Evolution mental crime,
whenever they can’t demonstrate, or otherwise support,
that Humans are descended from a beast of other sort.

Time is not an Element, Dimension, or a Force.
It plays no part whatever in what happens in due course.
It does not have Intelligence, and not the slightest Powers.
It is not self-divided into Seconds, Minute, Hours.

In fact and actuality, Time is but Nothingness.
Time is the lack of any substance, nothing more or less.
It had no true Beginning, and it will not have an End.
It is not something to be saved, or something to expend.

Its Measurement is artificial, as but Reference;
a means to place and keep in order Subsequent Events.
The “Past” is just a Record of Events that have occurred
since Record-keeping started as to things as done and heard.

Time leaves no ways to Travel either back or forth in it,
although the Past Events can be revised from what was writ,
and though some Things to come can be pre-scheduled in advance,
“Time-Travel back or forth of any Object has no chance.

Because one Object only can inhabit any Space,
each Space in backward Time is filled as every Move takes place,
and so the Past is blocked by every Object in each case,
preventing any Object from assuming prior Space.

The Travel forward happens only one tick at a time,
to everything at once throughout the Nothingness of Time,
to either be recorded or forgotten instantly,
according to Importance or to Triviality.

The Future is unwritten, like the next line on this Page,
So cannot be foreseen or skipped ahead of by some Sage.
Events to come can be Predicted, but not Guaranteed,
by those familiar with some Patterns and to where they lead.

A Pattern is made up of Actions taken in the Past,
by older groups of Leaders in the same Roles as now cast,
who made the same mistakes that Leaders are repeating Now,
creating same effects with same results, scarce changing How.

Unlike the Past, the Future can be altered instantly,
to change its Course from where it might be headed certainly
according to the Patterns as were followed in the Past
by Leaders who’d abused the Roles into which they’d been cast.

But nonetheless, no Object can proceed to Time ahead
because there’s only Nothingness beyond what’s done and said.
The Past and Present do Exist exactly as they are,
while Future must await until through Time we get that far.

This Poem was started in the Past, but could not finish there.
Within my Present, I placed every letter that is here,
creating its own Future in accordance with my Plan,
with even I not knowing all I’d write since it began.

I could change all my Words, but I could not go back in Time.
It will be in my Future that you’ll read what’s in this rhyme,
but in your Present which will even quicker turn to Past,
and you’ll not know before I tell you when it’s done at last.

I did not move from where I am, and neither so did you.
We did not Travel back or forth through Time, not able to,
and Time had no effect upon the the words as written here.
And so Time can’t be credited with with changes year to year.

But those who claim that Time allows or causes things to change
as cannot happen otherwise, are using logic strange.
For instance Evolutionists who cite “billions of years”
as explanation for defying science that appears.

It stands to science that one fish can’t breathe as humans do,
and any one or millions more would die while trying to,
so that they could not procreate and pass along their genes,
to slowly lose their gills in Time through this genetic means.

To cite the Lungfish as examples is absurdity.
They are as they had started and remained exclusively,
and none had turned to birds or beasts, and none had lost their gills,
regardless of the Time that passed, regardless of their wills.

The freaks and monsters in each species are not “typicals,”
but brought about through Incest and effects of Chemicals.
And there were no new Species, neither Links between the true,
since Life began on Earth as God intended it to do.

Whatever is impossible within one span of Life
remains as much impossible in Generations rife.
Whatever came “by accident” could happen by Design.
Whichever “links are missing” would have left at least a sign.

Because our Science cannot start a single living Cell,
or cross between two Species to create a third as well,
with all the knowledge and equipment that we have today,
then nothing happened “by pure Chance in Time,” as liars say.


By Joseph Sarandos
April 16, 2006

 


4/18/2006, 9:40 am Send Email to Joseph Sarandos   Send PM to Joseph Sarandos
 
Paynez
Registered user
Global user

Reply | Quote
Re: "Time" is a FALSE explanation by Evolutionists


Because our Science cannot start a single living Cell,
or cross between two Species to create a third as well,
with all the knowledge and equipment that we have today,
then nothing happened “by pure Chance in Time,” as liars say.



______________________

Nothing happened by pure chance in time.

It happened due to proximity. Evolution is affected by environment. Two things in the same local evolve alike and subsequently begin producing like offspring.

Move these creatures to a new/different environment and eventually they, after many generations change/adapt to the new enviroment.

It isn't a huge leap to think that like creatures migrated into many environments and over millenia adapted and evolved to the envirodifferences.

Time is irrelivent to the process unless you use time to measure it. Each generation using a time period eases the process in our minds.

I have never and will never believe in creationism. Their are simply too many flaws in the world to have been created by some all knowing, perfect being. If creationism is in fact true then it shows that the creater is imperfect.

Paynez

Last edited by Paynez, 6/3/2006, 12:55 am
6/3/2006, 12:54 am Send Email to Paynez   Send PM to Paynez
 


Add a reply






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 1/7/2009, 8:52 pm