“Mindless Evolutionism” is a RELIGION, not a Science. ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

The Full Truth Forum
 Creationism vs Evolutionism
  “Mindless Evolutionism” is a RELIGION, not a Science.
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

 
Joseph Sarandos
Head Administrator
Global user

Reply | Quote
“Mindless Evolutionism” is a RELIGION, not a Science.


It is the unfounded and un-provable belief in self-generation of Material out of absolute nothingness.

It is the nonsensical belief that Material is capable of thinking and planning.

It is the anti-scientific belief that Material was the source of the same Forces that had arranged and is keeping it into precise, interactive and interdependent animations as small as Atoms and as large as the inorganic Universe of Solar Systems and Galaxies.

But primarily, it is the audacious denial of the Creator entity as, not only the singular source of the simultaneous essentials of the inorganic physical universe; Material, Forces and Intelligence, but more importantly as the source of the spiritual Moral precepts and principles that guide the actions of only Humans among all of the animals.

The actual or pretentious belief in “Mindless Evolutionism” requires the actual or pretentious profession of “Atheism,” which is the actual or pretentious denial of the “third component” of only Man; the Spiritual, along with the Physical and Mental components that we share almost equally with each species of the so-called “lower” animals.

But “Atheism” (disbelief in or denial of the existence of any God or gods) is, like any form of “Pantheism” (belief in and worship of multiple gods), an actual Religion (a set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader), and is no less religious than “Monotheism” (the doctrine or belief that there is only one God).

It is a hollow argument to contend that Atheism does not spring from “spiritual” teachings, since the antonyms of “Spiritual” are “Materialistic” and “Earthly,” and therefore it does not matter whether the “spiritual leaders” were or are men of Religion, Philosophy, or Science, but only that the subject of their teachings was or is “intangible and un-measurable” rather than physical.

Cosmology, which is the study of the physical universe considered as a totality of phenomena in time and space, is the common basis of both “Creationism” and “Evolutionism” as theories (systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena).

But, Cosmology deals with only the purely physical and inorganic aspects of the Physical World, preceding and antedating the aspect of Life within it.

Therefore, Cosmology amounts to the “litmus test” as to the basic truths behind the theories of “Creationism” and “Mindless Evolution”.

It is by this “litmus test” of Cosmology that the theory of mindless (or god-less) evolution fails to establish itself as a free-standing concept, and shows itself to be fatally flawed at its very base, as a “scientific alternative” to belief in the pre-existence of a Creator entity, or “God,” i.e.;

The “Theory of Evolution” does not attempt to show or explain the source or sources of the Material from which the Universe took its start, but instead proceeds from the unexplained existence of a “Primordial” (always was) Mass of Elements, and then goes on to speculate as to how that mass had “exploded” into a self-intelligent and self-enforced pattern of internal arrangements through a series of random and accidental, “trial and error” occurrences, over millions or billions of years of yet-unmeasured “Time”.

The “Theory of Evolution” does not attempt to show or explain how any thing, of any size, could have proceeded from “absolute nothingness,” meaning the total lacks of physical Material and invisible Forces, with or without the presence of Intelligence.

Conversely, the “Stories of Creation,” as constitute the first two, back-to-back “chapters” of the first “book” of the Judeo-Christian Bible as it came down to our times, which stories are themselves contradictory of each other as translated and interpreted, take their starts from the pre-existence of “God the Creator,” and correctly name “him” as the sole source of the essential Material, Forces and Intelligence, but fail to speculate as to the “Biography” (past events surrounding a person) of this singular “God”.

It was from this “biographical lapse” in the otherwise-assertive “Stories of Creation” that the “Evolutionists” had been able to successfully assail the “Creationists” with the unanswerable question of; “Who created the Creator?”

However, and without regard to the subsequent “biological” mistakes of the so-called “Adam and Eve” version of Human genesis, the question of who created the Creator is a “red herring,” in that it simply does not matter to us and cannot be known to us in this life, i.e.;

Whether the singular Creator of this world is a lone entity, or one of many, the knowable facts indicate that “he” had acted alone and was the sole source of the essential Material, Forces and Intelligence as constitute this particular Physical World, whether or not there are other Physical Worlds created by other “Gods”.

My original hypothesis on Cosmology, that varies greatly from both the Theory of Evolution and the Stories of Creation that are extant and in competition with each other, begins with a variance from the “religious” belief and teaching that God resides in the world, but offers the more sensible alternative, that the world exists within the immeasurable mind or imagination of God, which alternative provides logical and analogical bases for the probably true beliefs that God is “Omnipresent” (present everywhere simultaneously), “Omniscient” (having total knowledge; knowing everything), and “Omnipotent” (having unlimited or universal power, authority, or force; all-powerful) with respect to this world.

Although it is impossible to positively prove that assertion and explanation, they nonetheless provide the earliest possible starting point from which to proceed into the scientifically supportable and provable “hows” of Cosmology, as constitute the balance of my hypothesis; “Part One” of which is published at this URL of The Full Truth Forum,:
Start of the Inorganic Universe

But, because of my inclusion of that assertion and explanation, my Cosmological hypothesis has been wrongly assailed as a “religious” essay, by those who contend that the Theory of Evolution is a “purely scientific” work.

However, my challenge remains open for anyone to provide a plausible alternative to the pre-existence of God as the source of the so-called “Primordial Mass,” that otherwise is asserted to have sprung from absolute nothingness, which concept is a scientific impossibility that can only be accepted on religious grounds, albeit that the religion is “Atheism”.

By Joseph Sarandos
3230 E. Westcott Avenue
Visalia, California 93292 USA
August 27, 2005


5/2/2006, 6:19 pm Send Email to Joseph Sarandos   Send PM to Joseph Sarandos
 
Paynez
Registered user
Global user

Reply | Quote
Re: “Mindless Evolutionism” is a RELIGION, not a Science.


The actual or pretentious belief in “Mindless Evolutionism” requires the actual or pretentious profession of “Atheism,” which is the actual or pretentious denial of the “third component” of only Man; the Spiritual, along with the Physical and Mental components that we share almost equally with each species of the so-called “lower” animals.


_________________

Religion isn't required to believe man has something. You call it spirit, I call it something else, simply energy.

Mindless evolution is exactly what happened due to pur chance of nature having started the process of life, through a mixture of things like sunlight, oxygen etc etc etc.

Life moved about eventually and began evolving according to its environs.

I dont understand why it seems difficult or even impossible for so many to understand or believe in evolution. To me it makes far more sense then creationism, which in my mind simply sounds like religious rants.

Whichever one believes isnt going to change anything though. Life still persists and goes on, no matter what any of us believe.

Paynez
6/3/2006, 1:04 am Send Email to Paynez   Send PM to Paynez
 


Add a reply






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 1/7/2009, 9:28 pm