Joseph Sarandos
Head Administrator
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
One of my EARLIEST analyses of the M-E/Iraq wars (1/20/03)
Know the Truth About This War
(By Joseph Sarandos)
January 20, 2003
Here is big America, encircling Iraq,
preparing for another, even deadlier attack,
but only after finding out where every weapon lies,
so that there would be no defenses coming by surprise.
This greatest military force would move against the least;
a lion perched to fight a mouse or other tiny beast
whose claws and teeth have been removed, to save the lion’s skin,
before the lion’s handlers would let the fight begin.
The third-world nation of Iraq is small and powerless,
ensuring that America would meet with great success
if it decides to move against its toothless, clawless foe,
with overwhelming force that would immediately flow.
At first, the bombs and missiles would rain down incessantly,
until there are no stores of food and weapons left to see,
and every shelter, every bunker, would have been destroyed,
then only later would be soldiers on the ground deployed.
Like "Desert Storm," that happened first about ten years ago,
and like the "war" that followed after, this one would be so;
One-sided, leaving naught to chance in terms of fighting back
by starving, bleeding, maimed and wounded soldiers of Iraq.
And like before, there would be children and their mothers slain,
dismembered, blinded, starved to death, or wounded in great pain.
But only wives and children of Iraqis would be lost.
Americans would not be paying this, the highest cost.
But nonetheless, Americans would die as "fighting men,"
on purpose or by accident; they did and would again.
The numbers would not matter; even one would be in vain.
A soldier has his life to lose, but nothing for to gain.
This would not be a war to save America the Land,
to guard its Constitution or its Freedom; understand?
This war would be to benefit a foreign government
and foreign people, which was not America’s intent.
The Arabs are the enemies of Israel, of Jews,
of Zionists who, for their homeland, Palestine did choose.
The Jewish population of America is small,
but in the world, "the Jewish People" does include them all.
Their three percent of population in America
are "Jewish first" in everything they do per capita.
The most are "dual citizens," with ties to Israel,
and most of them are either rich or faring very well.
They own the bulk of News and Entertainment Media,
so they control what’s seen and heard in all America.
They spread their propaganda by these means for fifty years,
to make "the Jewish Image" as it presently appears.
But in that time, they also gained control in government,
becoming "tail that wags the dog," by purpose and intent,
to occupy the "key" positions in bureaucracy,
ensuring that decisions would treat Jews most favorably.
The "Jewish Lobby," as it’s called; a tiny group of men,
ensured elections of their "puppets" time and time again,
by granting votes and monies, in return for promises,
to politicians who would push "the Jewish emphasis".
As puppets of the Jewish Lobby became prominent,
they did appoint and hire Jews within the government,
until the "key" positions; nine of every ten, in fact,
were filled by men who’d always "in the Jewish interest" act.
The most of high-placed lawyers and consultants are now Jews,
in government at every level, spouting Jewish views.
The lowest to the highest courts, throughout America,
are manned by Jews in high percentage to per capita.
(Continued below)
|
|
11/30/2006, 1:02 am
|
Send Email to Joseph Sarandos
Send PM to Joseph Sarandos
|
Joseph Sarandos
Head Administrator
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: One of my EARLIEST analyses of the M-E/Iraq wars (1/20/03)
The high-placed lawyers wrote new laws that politicians passed,
the high-placed Jewish judges changed old laws that had amassed,
until it was the common law, "from sea to shining sea,"
that Jews would live in favor and protection constantly.
Then, with such favor and protection, Zionists emerged,
and suddenly the interest in "the Jewish homeland" surged.
At once, it did become the "mission" of America
to favor Jews above the whole of all Arabia.
There were no votes or polls involved. "The People" had no voice.
The Government itself had made this pro-Semitic choice.
Though deep in debt, America sent money to the Jews,
along with planes and tanks and weapons they could freely use.
This "Foreign Aid," in many billions each and every year,
did make the State of Israel a force for all to fear,
as it committed genocide and war-atrocities
against the Palestinians, and took their properties.
This "Foreign Aid" continued and increased, as it does still,
despite the children and civilians Israel did kill.
America stood by the Jews no matter what they did,
and even helped to keep the Jewish war crimes deeply hid.
United Nations vetoes by America, the strong,
did stop investigations when the Jews were in the wrong.
It cost America its long-held seat on Human Rights,
but yet it still protects the Jews in all their unfair fights.
America demanded, for itself and Israel,
to be excluded from all war-crimes charges as they fell,
so none of their officials could be held responsible
for war crimes and atrocities as done by Israel.
America is represented internationally
by Zionist-Americans, almost exclusively,
who’d been appointed by the "puppets" in the Governments
who’d been elected thanks to "Jewish Lobby" influence.
America and Israel are now "one and the same,"
although they still appear as two, with each a different name.
The Jews control both nations with the same of certainty,
with one Agenda common, which is Jew-supremacy.
If it should come to pass, as it appears it surely might,
that once again Iraq will be invaded, although right,
by forces of America, directed by the Jews,
the chances are that, in the end, America will lose.
The Lions do not always win against the seeming Mice;
a lesson taught, but not well learned, although it happened twice.
American could not defeat the smaller, weaker States
of Vietnam and North Korea; history it hates.
Americans in uniform have naught but to obey.
No matter what the cause, they do as politicians say.
If ordered into battle, they can either kill or die,
but they cannot dissent; they can be shot if they should try.
But nonetheless, they act on conscience individually,
preferring to do right than wrong, the great majority.
In self-defense, they’d rather kill than die, expectedly,
but when the choice is neither, most will act-out morally.
To kill, there must be reasons that are justifiable,
or else it’s seen as murder, for which one is liable.
Protection of one’s self, one’s land, one’s blooded family,
one’s comrades, one’s beliefs and creeds, are reasons morally.
But, killing for the sake of strangers who will benefit
is not a moral reason that would well on conscience sit.
In Vietnam, as in Korea, moral reasons lacked,
and so the brave Americans did not like hoodlums act.
They did not hate the people they’d been sent in there to kill.
Instead, they were the hated, and they’re being hated still.
Those wars were not America’s to either win or lose,
and neither is the war between the Arabs and the Jews.
The Jews are fighting Arabs for the land that they possess,
which is but "forceful taking," nothing more and nothing less.
The Arabs fight to keep what’s theirs, as any humans would.
And so, the cause of Jews is bad, the cause of Arabs good.
Americans have naught to gain and nothing for to lose,
no matter if this war is won by Arabs or by Jews.
But, Jews have made America their ally in this fight,
although the Jews are in the wrong and Arabs in the right.
So, if America deploys its forces in Iraq,
Americans at home might be the victims of attack.
The Arabs are not evil beasts, fanatics, or mere fools.
They’ll fight to keep what’s theirs, and they’ll employ whatever tools.
At risk for Arabs are their wives and children, on their land,
which is the same for Jews, as they have come to understand.
But wives and children, and the parents of Americans
would be left home while soldiers fight against Arabians.
And therein lies the rub; the greatest rub of all, in fact.
The Arabs would not take this disadvantage if attacked.
Instead, they’d do the same to wives and children of their foe
as would be done to theirs, like human history does show.
With Jews and Arabs, there is this great similarity:
Their race comes first, and then religion, nationality.
America has many Arabs, even more than Jews,
as citizens and nationals, but keeping Arab views.
The situation matches that involving Japanese
while their land and America were deadly enemies.
In fear and expectation, which was either right or wrong,
the Japanese-Americans were locked away for long.
But, concentration camps for Arabs never would be built
because the Japanese survivors have been paid in guilt.
So, there would be surveillance of the Arabs, nothing more,
if there should be another, bigger, anti-Arab war.
The lesson taught by "9-11" must be understood;
the Arabs would be sacrificial, "dying for the good,"
like Kamikaze pilots did, and Palestinians,
to kill in retribution Jews and more Americans.
It’s not a matter of "religion," but of human mind,
and of the human preference for those of one’s same kind.
Vengeance and retaliation trump philosophy
when one’s own wife or child is murdered by one’s enemy.
There never could be peace between the Arabs and the Jews
because too many have been killed; this does not come as news.
Unlike it was with former foes that fought in World War Two,
no "trading partners" would emerge whenever this is through.
The Arab World is now committed; it will win or lose,
but never will it compromise with Israel and Jews.
And similarly, Israel will fight incessantly
until it wins or loses, with no other destiny.
America will either help the Jews forever more,
or "leave in peace with honor" sometime during this long war,
or share at last a victory or loss with Israel,
or break apart internally, as only time will tell.
---------------------------
|
|
11/30/2006, 1:04 am
|
Send Email to Joseph Sarandos
Send PM to Joseph Sarandos
|
Incog4
Senior Member
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: One of my EARLIEST analyses of the M-E/Iraq wars (1/20/03)
Joseph, my ideological compatriot and valued personal friend,
Like this poem shows, and as I've pointed out in another board, you have been right all along, since at least or before January 20, 2003, in your analyses, conclusions, explanations and prognoses with regard to the still-raging wars in Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Of course I personally know and understand the reasons why you now have to post only whenever your real life allows, which is mostly during "the wee hours," and I'm sure that the rest of our readers and your followers share this kowledge and understanding.
When I'm not on vacation or sick-leave, as I am now, I also manage a post or ten whenever I awake in the middle of the night for any reasons, whether here or in another board, especially at this stage of world politics when the important developments are always close to the front of my thoughts (as they are yours).
But, the page-views continue to prove the value of your "old" as well as your recent contributions to the true-knowledge-base of TFTF, and my membership in 2 of the private e-mail rings prove to me that our information is being put to good uses outside of the internet forums.
Excuse me for seeming "maudlin," but I'm still mellow from my supper glass(es) of Mogan David Red, and I firmly believe with reasons that this board and you are having profound effects upon the thinking and decisions of public officials in key positions, thanks to the efforts of those who quote, link to, or copy the facts from here in their e-mail and letter-writing campaigns.
It's now going on 4 AM our time, so I imagine that you've already hit the sack, as I'm getting close to doing, so I'll give you a call much later this morning or early afternoon, to bring you "up to speed" with what's been going on at the other board.
Rest well, old boy.
Aaron
|
|
11/30/2006, 3:53 am
|
Send Email to Incog4
Send PM to Incog4
|
insider3
Senior Member
Global user
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: One of my EARLIEST analyses of the M-E/Iraq wars (1/20/03)
Well it's after 6 in the morning here in DC and hereabout, so your "right coast contingent" of readers are up and about, probably still swilling their first cups of java and smoking their first cigarettes like me.
That was an outstanding piece of literature by Joseph, and I agree with what you wrote, Aaron.
Good morning or "sleep tight" to both of you as applicable. I'll be checking back during the day.
Bob
|
|
11/30/2006, 4:16 am
|
Send Email to insider3
Send PM to insider3
|
Add a reply
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 1/7/2009, 11:12 am
|
|
|
